PXD070243 is an
original dataset announced via ProteomeXchange.
Dataset Summary
| Title | Comparative Evaluation of Solid-Phase and Membrane Mimetic Strategies in Membrane Proteome Coverage and Disease-State Analysis |
| Description | Membrane proteins (MPs) are vital to cellular signaling, metabolism, and disease pathology, yet remain underrepresented in proteomics. To address this, several independent workflows have been developed to enable the profiling of the membrane proteome, however the relative advantages and limitations of each method remains poorly defined. Here, we systematically compare four classical solid-phase membrane proteomic workflows (SP3, SP4, FASP, S-Trap) and three membrane mimetic strategies (Peptidisc, nanodisc, and SMALP copolymer) for mass spectrometry-based membrane proteome profiling, using healthy (LFD) and obese (HFD) mouse liver tissue. We found that the solid-phase methods yield higher total protein identifications, while the membrane mimetic systems enrich MPs. SMALP copolymer displays intermediate characteristics between the solid-phase and membrane mimetic workflows. Peptidisc and nanodisc stand out for their enrichment of MPs, although Peptidisc shows better enrichment of plasma membrane integral MPs, particularly those with 11+ transmembrane segments. In the context of HFD-induced liver proteome remodeling, the Peptidisc workflow outperformed the other six methods by capturing the highest number of differentially expressed MPs and demonstrating the lowest standard deviation of MP-level dysregulation. Collectively, this comparative analysis highlights the trade-offs between depth of proteome coverage and MP enrichment across workflows, underscoring the importance of method selection based on total protein counts, MP enrichment, and the accurate detection of MP-level dysregulation. |
| HostingRepository | PRIDE |
| AnnounceDate | 2026-01-01 |
| AnnouncementXML | Submission_2026-01-01_13:08:01.297.xml |
| DigitalObjectIdentifier | |
| ReviewLevel | Peer-reviewed dataset |
| DatasetOrigin | Original dataset |
| RepositorySupport | Unsupported dataset by repository |
| PrimarySubmitter | Ashim Bhattacharya |
| SpeciesList | scientific name: Mus musculus (Mouse); NCBI TaxID: NEWT:10090; |
| ModificationList | acetylated residue; monohydroxylated residue; deamidated residue |
| Instrument | Orbitrap Exploris 480 |
Dataset History
| Revision | Datetime | Status | ChangeLog Entry |
| 0 | 2025-11-03 13:07:47 | ID requested | |
| ⏵ 1 | 2026-01-01 13:08:02 | announced | |
Publication List
| 10.1016/j.mcpro.2025.101496; |
| Antony F, Bhattacharya A, Aoki H, Jandu RS, Abdualkader AM, Al Batran R, Babu M, Duong van Hoa F, Comparative Evaluation of Solid-phase and Membrane Mimetic Strategies in Membrane Proteome Coverage and Disease-State Analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics, 25(2):101496(2025) [pubmed] |
Keyword List
| submitter keyword: Membrane Proteomics, Membrane Mimetics, Disease-State Analysis |
Contact List
| Dr. Franck Duong |
| contact affiliation | University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology |
| contact email | fduong@mail.ubc.ca |
| lab head | |
| Ashim Bhattacharya |
| contact affiliation | University of British Columbia |
| contact email | ashim938@student.ubc.ca |
| dataset submitter | |
Full Dataset Link List
Dataset FTP location
NOTE: Most web browsers have now discontinued native support for FTP access within the browser window. But you can usually install another FTP app (we recommend FileZilla) and configure your browser to launch the external application when you click on this FTP link. Or otherwise, launch an app that supports FTP (like FileZilla) and use this address: ftp://ftp.pride.ebi.ac.uk/pride/data/archive/2026/01/PXD070243 |
| PRIDE project URI |
Repository Record List
[ + ]
[ - ]
- PRIDE
- PXD070243
- Label: PRIDE project
- Name: Comparative Evaluation of Solid-Phase and Membrane Mimetic Strategies in Membrane Proteome Coverage and Disease-State Analysis